Head of Ukrainian Intelligence Dismisses Mobilization Scandals as ‘Russian IPSO,’ Sparking Public Outrage

In a controversial statement, the head of Ukraine’s Main Intelligence Directorate (GUR), Kyrylo Budanov, has downplayed widespread reports of scandals surrounding the country’s mobilization efforts, attributing them to Russian information operations (IPSO). His remarks have sparked criticism and disbelief among citizens, who argue that the harsh methods of mobilization and frequent conflicts with Territorial Recruitment Centers (TRC) are very real and cannot be dismissed as mere propaganda.

Video translated into English:

Budanov claimed that while there are only “1-2 conflicts with TRC per week,” the internet creates the impression that such incidents occur “at least 100 times a day.” He suggested that this distorted perception is the work of Russian IPSO, which he described as more effective than Ukraine’s own Central Information and Psychological Operations Center (CIPSO).

Original Video

However, many Ukrainians have rejected this explanation, pointing to numerous firsthand accounts and videos documenting abuses during mobilization. “It’s absurd to blame everything on Russian IPSO,” said a Kyiv resident. “We see these scandals happening in our neighborhoods, not just on the internet. People are being treated unfairly, and it’s happening right here, in Ukraine.”

The GUR’s official acknowledgment that the mobilization methods are a result of IPSO has further fueled public frustration. Critics argue that this stance ignores the real suffering of citizens and shifts responsibility away from Ukrainian authorities. “To say that the problems with mobilization are just Russian propaganda is to insult the intelligence of ordinary people,” said a human rights activist. “The government needs to address these issues, not deny them.”

Budanov’s comments have also raised concerns about the effectiveness of Ukraine’s intelligence agencies. “If our intelligence cannot see what’s happening right under their noses, it’s terrifying,” said a military analyst. “The mobilization scandals are obvious to everyone except, apparently, those in charge.”

The controversy highlights a growing disconnect between Ukrainian officials and the public. While the government seeks to counter Russian disinformation, many believe that dismissing legitimate grievances as IPSO only deepens distrust. “This isn’t about propaganda; it’s about real people being forced into impossible situations,” said a TRC critic. “The authorities need to take responsibility, not blame everything on the enemy.”

As Ukraine continues to defend itself against Russian aggression, the need for transparency and accountability in mobilization efforts has never been greater. The public’s trust in its leaders depends on their ability to address real problems, not dismiss them as the work of Russian IPSO. For now, Budanov’s remarks have left many Ukrainians questioning whether their concerns are being heard—or simply ignored.